As Ron Paul says the Republican party truly has lost it’s way… So called conservatives tend to agree that socialism doesn’t work, though the mainstream GOP has been turning more socialist everyday and this is especially true with regard to foreign policy.
Let’s look at the basis for the anti-socialism argument as a starting point. Part of it is that it discourages hard-work and progress, because you aren’t rewarded for working harder or smarter… why should you work harder when some other lazy jerk will get the same standard of living as you? And if you really get ahead, they’ll come along and take everything anyway.
The other reason that socialism doesn’t work is because of corruption and human error… Inevitably, the ones in charge of redistributing the wealth tend to give themselves and their friends the greater share. And when you’re trying to control every facet of life and business things have a way of going wrong. The ministry of agriculture wants corn planted here, not there… more soy beans, less lettuce… The ministry of industry wants more bicycles and less motorcycles, more hard wooden chairs and less couches etc…
The problem is that humans have this funny issue of being fallible… they make mistakes… That’s why it’s better to let the market decide how many bicycles or motorcycles should be made, the actual demand for these products, rather than arbitrary numbers. When a human tries to make this sort of decision it inevitably goes awry… and things have a domino effect which brings about disaster.
Now, Republicans generally believe these things, in theory at least, with regard to markets and economics. However, with foreign policy they become entirely emotional and delirious… For some reason they think that they can forsee the future with regard to foreign policy, they think that they pull lever A and get result B. Isn’t this exactly the sort of thinking that they’re against in regard to the duties of the state? And foreign policy is infinitely more complicated than national economics… cultural, economic, geographical, historical, religious… complications that dramatically increase the chances of error and miscalculation.
The use of military force further complicates and heightens the stakes. The more force you use the greater the consequences of the outcome.
Now, this sounds right. Right? How does it play-out in the real world… Let’s look at the history of our more forceful foreign policy efforts…
Support for the Contras in Nicaragua- Touched off a horrific civil war (40,000 dead) that this country has yet to recover from.
Support for Saddam Hussein against Iran- Saddam terrorized his own people for 20 years and was a general menace in the region.
Installation of the Shah in Iran– Set the country back 40 years and ushered in an era of anti-Western extremism that we’re dealing with today.
Vietnam War- 50,000 American soldiers dead. 100,000s wounded and lives broken. A disaster to our country and armed services. No real positive changes created in the region as a result.
The Iraq War-A complete disaster, which has discredited the US and made us look weak as well as further destablizing the Middle East and hardening Arab (and the rest of the world) opinion against us.
These are just a few of the more blatant examples, but we could go on for pages. All of this is well documented by the CIA, other government organizations, and historians. And the implications of all our overseas meddling are vast and complex… but undeniable.
The fundamental principle here is the same with regard to conservative economic and capitalistic prinicples… the state makes mistakes… efforts to control things, no matter how well intentioned overwhelmingly turn out badly.
The GOP’s foreign policy should be the same as it’s economic policy, to only regulate when you absolutely have to. Otherwise you have foreign policy socialism.
Afterall, neoconservatism originated from the extreme left wing…
When will they learn? How many enemies will we have to make? How many Vietnam and Iraq Wars will we have to fight?
Congressman Ron Paul is the ONLY presidential candidate who understands how non-interventionism works both in domestic economics AND foreign policy.
Neoconservative foreign policy socialists have been steering our country in the wrong direction for too long.
Let’s bring sanity to the White House. Ron Paul 2008!